Harnessing the Power of Redux Toolkit 2.0 in Modern Applications

Anton Ioffe - January 9th 2024 - 10 minutes read

Welcome to an evolutionary leap in state management for modern applications: Redux Toolkit 2.0 heralds a transformative era where simplicity meets robust capability. As we usher in TypeScript's reign, streamline migration processes, and refine query mechanisms, prepare to cultivate a toolkit that responds to today's developer challenges with unyielding precision. As you plunge into the deep end of this article, exclusive insights await—revealing not only the enhanced features and performance upgrades but also equipping you with strategic wisdom to navigate the swells of transition. From code-splitting wonders to dynamic middlewares, we chart a course through Redux Toolkit's sophisticated landscape to future-proof your applications against the currents of change. Strap in, fellow developers, as we decode the intricacies of Redux Toolkit 2.0, ensuring your next project is not just successful, but state-of-the-art.

The Redux Toolkit 2.0 Revolution: Advancements in State Management

As the JavaScript ecosystem continues to evolve, Redux Toolkit (RTK) 2.0 marks a significant stride in the realm of state management. Embracing TypeScript fundamentally transforms the development experience, marrying Redux's robust state management capabilities with TypeScript's stringent type safety. This synthesis facilitates more informed coding, empowering developers with intuitive autocompletion, efficient refactoring, and an overall reduction in runtime errors. The crux of RTK 2.0's revolution lies in its TypeScript-first architecture, which aligns seamlessly with modern web development workflows and acknowledges the rising prevalence of TypeScript in scaling complex applications.

The overhaul of Redux Toolkit's internal mechanisms addresses historical pain points and streamlines state management. Traditional Redux often entailed writing verbose boilerplate code, but RTK 2.0 continues to chip away at this inefficiency through mechanisms like createSlice(), which encapsulate actions and reducers in a concise API. The integration with Immer for immutable state updates further smoothens the Redux development experience, eliminating common immutability-related errors and simplifying complex state manipulation.

Another pillar of RTK 2.0's state management revolution is its performance optimization focus. Memoization, a cornerstone of efficient state selection, is given prime attention to ensure that component re-renders are minimized, facilitating better application performance even as state complexity grows. This concern for performance is deeply ingrained in RTK 2.0's design, influencing features across the board and compelling developers to think critically about state access patterns and reusability.

Substantial thought has been put into refining Redux's debugging story, with Redux Toolkit maintaining first-class support for Redux DevTools. This integration enables time-travel debugging and action inspection, providing a powerful window into the state of an application at any point in time. Developers can thus troubleshoot effectively, trace state mutations back to their origin, and maintain robust, predictable application behavior.

Finally, RTK 2.0 ushers in a realm where state management is not just about maintaining state but doing so with an eye towards modularity and code organization. With features such as createAsyncThunk for seamless handling of asynchronous actions and a simplified store configuration process, RTK 2.0 encourages developers to craft applications that are scalable and maintainable from the get-go. The toolkit's philosophy isn't merely about offering a collection of tools; it’s about shaping a mindset that treats state management as a cornerstone of application architecture, poised to facilitate complex features and workflows with grace.

Confronting Breaking Changes: Migration Tactics and Code Upgrades

One of the most pivotal breaking changes that Redux Toolkit 2.0 introduces is the enforcement of action types as string literals. This move is aimed at ensuring the serializability of actions and fostering enhanced readability within Redux DevTools. Prior versions may have facilitated the use of Symbols or other constructs as action types, but this practice is no longer compatible. To align with the new standards, developers need to carefully refactor their actions. Take for instance the following legacy code:

// Before: Using Symbol as action type
const MY_ACTION = Symbol('MY_ACTION');

This should be refactored to a string literal like so:

// After: Refactoring to string literal action type

Another significant change is the deprecation of the AnyAction type. In the previous iterations of Redux Toolkit, AnyAction could be used as a means to indicate that an action of any type could be dispatched. However, RTK 2.0 gravitates towards more explicit type definitions. Instead of a generic catch-all type, actions are required to adhere to specific types, increasing type safety and reducing potential runtime errors. If your codebase has made use of AnyAction, you should replace it with specific actions or a union of action types that accurately reflect the possible actions in your application.

Here is an example that contrasts the old and new patterns:

// Before: Using AnyAction
function myReducer(state, action: AnyAction) {
   // reducer logic here

// After: Replace AnyAction with specific action types
function myReducer(state, action: MyActionType | AnotherActionType) {
   // reducer logic here

During the migration process, developers should consciously scrutinize their existing state slices and refactor them towards greater specificity and adherence to the new norm. This approach not only syncs with RTK 2.0's focus on type safety but also facilitates more predictable state management. It’s crucial for developers to analyze each slice and ensure they are dispatching and handling actions appropriately.

Strategically approaching these breaking changes involves a two-fold strategy: first, developers must ensure every action dispatched through the toolkit is now serialized as a string; second, replace the use of AnyAction with precise action types enabling a safer and more robust development experience. A systematic audit of the existing codebase coupled with a clearly defined refactoring plan facilitates a smoother transition and guards against the introduction of new bugs.

Confronting these evolutionary adjustments within Redux Toolkit 2.0 can initially appear daunting, yet they beckon a step towards a more mature and maintainable codebase. Developers who embrace these changes will see the benefits manifest in the form of clearer, more easily navigable code, making state management an exercise in precision and efficiency. Consequently, it's worth considering how these enforced patterns not only address immediate migration needs but also prepare the application for future scalability and development.

Revamped RTK Query: Performance and Invalidation Strategies

RTK Query within Redux Toolkit 2.0 brings a meticulous refinement to caching mechanisms. By ensuring every cache entry is observed, RTK Query extinguishes many subtle bugs that previously emerged from untracked entries, bolstering both query accuracy and timely updates. This meticulous monitoring translates to more reliable and consistent performance, as developers no longer need to deal with unpredictable query states. By honing in the cache logic, not only does RTK Query optimize the performance, but it also establishes a more robust foundation for developing complex applications with data that demands real-time precision.

Enhancements to subscription handling allow a finer-grained control over component updates in response to state changes. With the revamped RTK Query, subscriptions are more intelligible and will not lead to unnecessary re-renders, which have been a common pain point for developers aiming for optimally responsive interfaces. These optimizations mean that applications using RTK 2.0 can scale successfully without being impeded by performance bottlenecks that typically accompany complex state dynamics.

RTK Query now includes a sophisticated tag-based invalidation method. The invalidationBehavior setting allows developers to batch invalidation events by configuring it to 'delayed'. This process reaps considerable performance benefits, particularly in applications that are subject to frequent and rapid updates where traditional invalidation strategies can lead to costly update cycles.

// RTK Query with delayed invalidation behavior
const api = createApi({
    baseQuery: fetchBaseQuery({ baseUrl: '/api' }),
    endpoints: (builder) => ({
        // Endpoints here…
    invalidationBehavior: 'delayed'

In the snippet above, by aggregating invalidations, RTK Query minimizes the number of renders and state diff computations that occur, thus conserving resources and ensuring smoother user experiences. This is crucial for data-intensive applications where the state can fluctuate rapidly and the overhead of constant revalidation can otherwise be significant.

One must be cautious to avoid a common pitfall: excessive invalidations that lead to the dreaded 'waterfall' of queries. Too many simultaneous invalidations can spawn a cascade of data refetching that grinds the application to a halt. By adopting the 'delayed' invalidation strategy, developers can dodge this pitfall, as it permits fine-tuning the timing of these re-fetches. This feat of performance engineering is emblematic of the thoughtfulness that RTK 2.0 exhibits in providing tools that skew towards real-world applicability.

To provoke consideration, developers should ask themselves how the enhanced caching and subscription optimizations can be tailored to their app's specific performance profile. With robust invalidation strategies at their disposal, what architecture modifications will unlock the most significant performance gains in their systems, and how will the finer control over render cycles affect their present and future UI components?

Harnessing New Features for Future-Proof Redux Apps

Redux Toolkit 2.0 introduces the combineSlices API, enhancing the modular nature of applications by enabling the dynamic combination of reducer slices. Particularly beneficial in large applications, this method allows independent modules to be loaded on an as-needed basis, addressing the challenge of scalability and initially long load times. The following real-world code example demonstrates how to apply combineSlices to dynamically load slices, a pivotal step towards achieving a modular code layout that scales with an application's requirements:

import { combineSlices, configureStore } from '@reduxjs/toolkit';

// Placeholder for asynchronously loaded slices
const asyncSlices = {};

// Function to dynamically add a slice at runtime
function injectSlice(store, key, sliceReducer) {
    asyncSlices[key] = sliceReducer;

// Initial empty store, awaiting dynamic slice injection
const store = configureStore({ reducer: combineSlices({}) });

// Example of runtime injection for a 'products' slice
// injectSlice(store, 'products', productsSlice.reducer);

Enhancing selectors within 'createSlice', Redux Toolkit now fosters ideology where actions, reducers, and selectors coalesce seamlessly. The inclusion of selectors in the slice's definition sharpens development workflows, making the state more accessible, and reducing the overhead of managing separate selector files. The following code snippet illuminates the selection integration, showing how the new createSlice can better map the relationship between the state structure and the selectors:

import { createSlice } from '@reduxjs/toolkit';

const userSlice = createSlice({
    name: 'user',
    initialState: { data: null },
    reducers: {
        setUser(state, action) {
            state.data = action.payload;
    // Selectors are co-located within the slice
    selectors: {
        userData: (state) => state.user.data

// Auto-generated selectors are now accessed easily
const selectUserData = userSlice.selectors.userData;

// Export actions and reducer for global use
export const { setUser } = userSlice.actions;
export const userReducer = userSlice.reducer;

Redux Toolkit 2.0 caters to advanced middleware handling by enabling the dynamic addition of middleware at runtime. This approach lays the foundation for a performant startup and the flexible extension of the application's functionality through conditional middleware loading. The flexibility gained is exemplified in the code below, which showcases the preferred method of augmenting a store with middleware based on application context:

import { configureStore } from '@reduxjs/toolkit';

const store = configureStore({ reducer: {}, middleware: (getDefaultMiddleware) => getDefaultMiddleware() });

// Function for adding middleware to the store
function addMiddleware(store, newMiddleware) {

// Example analytics middleware, logging actions
const analyticsMiddleware = store => next => action => {
    // Potential place for integrating analytics tracking
    console.log(`Analytics Event: ${action.type}`);
    return next(action);

// Conditional analytics middleware addition
// if (userInteractsWithFeature) {
//   addMiddleware(store, analyticsMiddleware);
// }

Implementing dynamic feature loading encourages agile and potent applications. However, developers must employ it sensibly to avoid complexity that obscures the essential architecture of the application. Strategic implementation is crucial, ensuring that the granularity of modular loading does not overshadow the simplicity meant to be provided by the Redux Toolkit 2.0 enhancements.

Consider how dynamic feature loading and selector integration in createSlice can be orchestrated to maximize value in your application. How do you maintain a clear architecture while benefiting from flexibility? In planning for your application's growth, how do these new features enable you to design more adaptable state management strategies that will stand the test of time?

Migrating Mindfully: Common Pitfalls and Best Practice Insights

Migrating to Redux Toolkit 2.0 introduces several common pitfalls related to state management. One notable challenge is the handling of selectors. A frequent oversight is a failure to optimize selector memoization, which can undermine application performance. Without proper memoization, selectors might trigger rerenders unnecessarily, as they could return new object references even when the underlying state has not changed. To prevent this, developers should use Redux Toolkit's [createEntityAdapter](https://borstch.com/blog/development/utilizing-redux-toolkit-20-advanced-features-and-upgrades) or the enhanced createSelector. The createEntityAdapter simplifies the creation of selectors that are automatically memoized, while createSelector can optimize custom selector logic. Here's an example of a correctly memoized selector using createEntityAdapter:

import { createEntityAdapter } from '@reduxjs/toolkit';

// Assuming a state structure with a users slice
const usersAdapter = createEntityAdapter();
const { selectAll: selectAllUsers } = usersAdapter.getSelectors(state => state.users);

// Usage within a React component
const allUsers = useSelector(selectAllUsers);

This ensures that the allUsers variable points to the same array instance unless the users slice of the state has actually changed.

Another common migration mistake is handling non-serializable data within the state or actions. Redux Toolkit enforces the principle that all state and actions should be serializable to ensure compatibility with time-travel debugging and to maintain the predictability of the application state. Developers should avoid storing instances of classes, functions, or other non-serializable values in the state or passing them in actions. For example, a misstep would be storing a Date object directly in the state:

// Incorrect: Storing a non-serializable value in the state
initialState: {
    lastUpdated: new Date(),

The correct approach involves storing serializable data, such as the date represented as a string or a timestamp:

// Correct: Storing serializable value in the state
initialState: {
    lastUpdated: new Date().toISOString(),

State mutation is another potential pitfall. While Redux Toolkit uses Immer under the hood to allow for a more declarative state manipulation style, developers must still be careful not to mutate state directly in reducers outside of the toolkit's mechanisms. Direct mutation can lead to subtle bugs and violates Redux's core principle of immutability. Consider this incorrect example:

// Incorrect: Mutating the state directly
function todosReducer(state, action) {
    if (action.type === 'todos/todoAdded') {
    return state;

Instead, use the utilities provided by Redux Toolkit to handle updates immutably:

// Correct: Using createReducer to handle state updates immutably
const todosReducer = createReducer([], {
    'todos/todoAdded': (state, action) => {
        // Immer enables us to "mutate" the draft state

By being aware of these common mistakes and correcting them, developers can avoid unnecessary performance issues and bugs. How might existing applications benefit from an audit of selectors, action payloads, and state mutations to ensure they adhere to these best practices? Reflecting on this can lead to cleaner code and a more robust application architecture.


The article discusses the advancements and benefits of Redux Toolkit 2.0 in modern web development, including improved state management, performance optimization, and code organization. It also explores migration strategies and highlights the importance of handling breaking changes mindfully. The article challenges developers to optimize selector memoization and avoid common migration pitfalls, such as handling non-serializable data and directly mutating state. It encourages readers to think about how the new features of Redux Toolkit can be harnessed to create more adaptable and scalable state management strategies. A task related to this topic could be to refactor existing Redux code to incorporate the new features of Redux Toolkit 2.0, ensuring optimized selector memoization and avoiding non-serializable data within the state.

Don't Get Left Behind:
The Top 5 Career-Ending Mistakes Software Developers Make
FREE Cheat Sheet for Software Developers