Testing Methodologies Specific to Redux Saga

Anton Ioffe - February 2nd 2024 - 10 minutes read

In the rapidly evolving landscape of modern web development, mastering Redux Saga testing has emerged as a crucial skill set for enhancing application resilience and ensuring robust side effects management. This article delves deep into the nuanced world of Redux Saga testing, from unpacking the intricacies of unit testing Sagas, either through a meticulous step-by-step approach or by executing full Saga scenarios, to pioneering advanced strategies for tackling asynchronous operations, branching logic, and error handling with finesse. Alongside, we'll navigate common pitfalls and underscore best practices that refine your testing methodologies. Whether you're aiming to elevate your testing rigour or seeking to streamline your existing strategies, this comprehensive guide promises insights that will transform how you test Redux Sagas, marking a step change in your development journey.

Understanding Redux Saga and Its Testing Complexities

Redux Saga operates as a middleware within the Redux ecosystem, enabling robust management of side effects in JavaScript applications. Sagas leverage the power of generator functions to simplify complex asynchronous operations and event handling. By dispatching actions, Sagas are notified and can subsequently perform side effects like API calls, accessing browser storage, or any I/O operations in a non-blocking manner. This design allows application logic to remain clean, with pure functions for state updates in reducers and side-effect handling isolated within sagas.

Generator functions, the core of Redux Saga, utilize the yield keyword to pause and resume execution. This capability is essential for handling asynchronous operations without blocking the application's main thread. Within a saga, you can dispatch actions using put, call asynchronous functions with call, and select data from the state using select. These effects are plain JavaScript objects describing the intended side effect, which the saga middleware interprets and executes accordingly. The middleware's role extends to managing saga execution, starting, pausing, and resuming based on the yielded effects.

However, the testing of Redux Sagas introduces its own set of complexities, primarily due to their asynchronous nature and the handling of side effects. Since sagas result in effects that are descriptions of what to do rather than directly performing operations, asserting the outcomes of saga executions involves comparing yielded effects against expected effects. This indirection can make testing challenging, as it requires a deep understanding of the saga effects and the external operations they represent.

The inherently asynchronous operations within sagas further complicate testing methodologies. Traditional synchronous testing approaches do not apply well, as they can lead to scenarios where tests prematurely pass or fail without waiting for all side effects to be resolved. The need for accurately simulating and asserting the asynchronous flow of a saga, including the sequencing of effects and handling of potential errors, adds an additional layer of difficulty in ensuring comprehensive test coverage.

Moreover, the indirect execution of side effects through the middleware means that tests need to closely mimic the saga middleware environment. This often involves using specialized testing libraries or frameworks designed for Redux Saga, which can execute and assert effects in a controlled test environment. Despite these challenges, the ability to isolate and test the logic within sagas—separately from the UI components and state management logic—remains a powerful aspect of using Redux Saga in application development.

Unit Testing Sagas: Step-by-Step Approach vs. Whole Saga Execution

In the landscape of unit testing Redux Sagas, two primary methodologies emerge: the step-by-step (yield-by-yield) testing approach and the execution of the full saga as a single comprehensive unit. The step-by-step method involves examining each yield statement in a saga's generator function, assessing the yielded effects individually. This approach offers a granular level of testing, where developers can assert the equality of yielded effects at each step. It allows for a meticulous inspection of the saga's behavior, ensuring that each piece of logic performs as expected. However, this method can become cumbersome and brittle over time, especially as sagas evolve and their complexity increases. Refactoring a saga, even slightly, might necessitate a complete overhaul of associated tests, diminishing maintainability.

function* exampleSaga(action) {
    yield put({ type: 'ACTION_START' });
    const data = yield call(fetchData, action.payload);
    yield put({ type: 'ACTION_SUCCESS', data });

Conversely, testing the saga as a whole unit involves running the entire saga from start to finish, feeding it with a predefined state and actions and then examining the final state and effects it produced. This method abstracts away the step-by-step internals, focusing instead on the observable outcomes of running the saga. It suits scenarios where the precise internal workings of a saga are less relevant than its end effects on the application's state. While this approach improves test robustness against refactoring, it may mask certain types of bugs that occur within the finer details of saga logic. Additionally, it necessitates a more complex setup, mocking the environment in which the saga operates.

it('executes full saga and produces expected actions', async () => {
    const dispatched = [];
    const fakeStore = {
        getState: () => ({}),
        dispatch: action => dispatched.push(action),
    await runSaga(fakeStore, exampleSaga, { payload: 'test' }).done;
        { type: 'ACTION_START' },
        { type: 'ACTION_SUCCESS', data: 'fetched data' },

Choosing between these testing methodologies hinges on the intended coverage and the specific characteristics of the saga under test. Step-by-step testing is unmatched in its ability to pinpoint errors at the yield level but may lead to fragile tests that are hard to maintain. Testing the full saga execution shines in scenarios demanding coverage of the saga's overall effect on application state, offering resilience against internal changes at the cost of potentially overlooking detailed logic flaws.

Moreover, the correct approach might also involve a hybrid model, leveraging the strengths of both methodologies. Initial development and troubleshooting of complex sagas can benefit from the precision of step-by-step testing. Once the saga stabilizes, shifting towards full saga execution tests can safeguard against regression while easing test maintenance.

Consider the following when deciding on a testing strategy: Which aspects of the saga are most critical to your application? Is it the intricacy of the saga's internal logic or the broader impacts on application state and side effects? How likely is the saga to undergo significant changes, and what will the impact be on your test suite? These questions can guide a testing strategy that balances thoroughness with maintainability, ensuring robust testing coverage for Redux Sagas.

Mocking and Handling Asynchronous Operations in Saga Testing

In the realm of Redux Saga testing, effectively mocking asynchronous operations and external dependencies is paramount. Leveraging Jest for this purpose allows developers to simulate API calls that a saga might invoke. This process entails mocking the async functions so that when the saga calls these functions, the test intercepts these calls and returns predetermined data. This technique ensures that tests run in a controlled environment, making them deterministic and less prone to failure due to external data changes or network issues.

Crucially, mocking the store’s state is also a significant aspect of saga testing. By manipulating the store's state in tests, developers can ascertain how sagas behave under different state conditions without needing to alter the actual store’s state. This approach allows for testing the sagas' logic in isolation, focusing solely on the saga's behavior rather than the entire Redux setup.

Utilizing Redux Saga's call effect is another cornerstone for cleaner and more maintainable tests. The call effect, designed for calling asynchronous methods, can be easily mocked in tests. This mocking is often achieved by creating a fake function that mimics the async operation and then instructing the saga test to expect a call effect with this fake function. This level of abstraction means tests can avoid delving into the implementation details of the async function itself, focusing instead on the saga’s logic and the effects it produces.

To accurately simulate real-world scenarios in saga tests, it is essential to combine these strategies effectively. Mocking API calls using Jest, alongside manipulating the store’s state and leveraging the call effect, provides a robust framework for testing sagas. This structured approach enables developers to create comprehensive test suites that validate sagas' behavior with granularity and precision, ensuring that the asynchronous operations and side effects are correctly managed and executed within the Redux Saga environment.

In practice, the integration of these methodologies not only boosts the reliability of saga tests but also enhances the overall quality of the application. By ensuring that sagas are thoroughly tested against various scenarios and state conditions, developers can confidently deploy features knowing that the application's logic will perform as expected under diverse conditions. This comprehensive testing strategy ultimately contributes to building resilient, high-quality web applications.

Advanced Testing Techniques: Branching and Error Handling

Testing advanced scenarios in Redux Sagas, specifically branching logic and error handling, requires an in-depth understanding of saga effects and how they interact with the application state and external APIs. When dealing with branching logic, your sagas may yield different effects based on certain conditions or state values. This adds complexity to your tests as you need to ensure that your saga behaves correctly under various conditions. Using redux-saga-test-plan, you can simplify these testing scenarios by applying dynamic data to simulate different branches of your saga. This method allows for more comprehensive coverage, ensuring that all paths through your saga are correctly executed and handled.

function* myBranchingSaga(action) {
    try {
        const condition = yield select(selectSomeCondition);
        if (condition) {
            yield call(apiCallWithCondition, action.payload);
        } else {
            yield call(apiCallWithoutCondition, action.payload);
        yield put({type: 'ACTION_SUCCESS'});
    } catch (error) {
        yield put({type: 'ACTION_FAILURE', error});

In the above example, the saga branches based on a condition obtained from the application's state. Using redux-saga-test-plan's dynamic capabilities, you can test both branches of this saga by mocking the state for each condition.

Concerning error handling, sagas often include try/catch blocks to manage exceptions, particularly those that arise during asynchronous operations like API calls. It is crucial to test how your saga handles these exceptions to ensure that it correctly dispatches failure actions or performs other recovery procedures.

expectSaga(myBranchingSaga, {type: 'ACTION_START'})
        [select(selectSomeCondition), true],
        [call(apiCallWithCondition, action.payload), throwError(new Error('An error'))],
    .put({type: 'ACTION_FAILURE', error: expect.any(Error)})

The snippet above demonstrates how to simulate an error in one of the saga's branches. By specifying that the apiCallWithCondition should throw an error, you can assert that the saga dispatches an ACTION_FAILURE as expected.

A key advantage of using redux-saga-test-plan for these complex testing scenarios is its support for both integration testing and unit testing paradigms. This flexibility allows you to choose the most suitable approach depending on the complexity of the saga and the specificity of the test case. For branching logic and error handling scenarios, integration testing is particularly beneficial as it enables you to test the saga's behavior in a context that closely resembles its real-world environment.

However, it's important to note that while redux-saga-test-plan facilitates the testing of dynamic and error-prone saga flows, careful consideration must still be given to the setup of your test cases. Ensuring that mocked states, actions, and API responses accurately reflect possible real-world scenarios is crucial. Without this diligence, tests may pass while failing to catch issues that could occur in production.

In conclusion, advanced testing techniques for Redux Sagas, such as handling branching logic and error handling flows, are made considerably more accessible by tools like redux-saga-test-plan. By leveraging its capabilities to simulate dynamic data and exceptions, you can ensure your sagas behave as expected under various conditions, thereby enhancing the robustness and reliability of your application.

Common Pitfalls and Best Practices in Redux Saga Testing

One common pitfall in Redux Saga testing is the improper mocking of asynchronous functions and external services. Developers often attempt to simulate the exact behavior of these services, leading to tests that are too closely tied to the implementation details. This not only makes the tests brittle and subject to frequent breakages upon refactoring but also misses the point of testing the saga's integration and handling of side effects properly. A better approach is to use abstraction for mocking external dependencies, focusing on the saga's behavior in response to these dependencies rather than on the detailed workings of the dependencies themselves.

Another mistake is over-testing the implementation details of sagas, such as the precise order in which effects are yielded. While it's important to ensure that sagas produce the correct effects, overly prescriptive tests can stifle refactoring and make the tests themselves a burden to maintain. It's beneficial to test the overall outcome of a saga run rather than the specific sequence of yield statements. This approach aligns more closely with the saga's role in managing effects and allows for more flexible code evolution.

Neglecting to test the ordering of saga effects where it truly matters is a flip side to the problem of over-testing. In cases where the sequence of operations is crucial for correctness—such as a login flow where a token must be set before making authenticated requests—it's essential to assert the proper ordering of effects. Failing to do so can lead to false positives in testing, where the tests pass despite saga logic that would lead to bugs in a real application scenario.

To ensure efficiency, reliability, and maintainability in Redux Saga testing, adopting a few best practices is beneficial. Firstly, leverage tools like redux-saga-test-plan that facilitate both integration and unit testing, providing a balance between detailed assertion of effects and testing the saga's end-to-end behavior within a mocked Redux store environment. Secondly, abstract mocking to focus on behavior rather than implementation, using partial matchers for effect assertions whenever possible to reduce test fragility.

Lastly, always keep the big picture in mind: the primary goal of testing sagas is to ensure that they correctly orchestrate side effects in response to actions in the Redux store. Tests should be designed to affirm this capability without becoming overly entangled in the specifics of the saga's implementation. By focusing on outcomes and leveraging modern testing tools designed for Redux Saga, developers can create a robust, maintainable testing suite that enhances the quality and reliability of their applications.


This article provides an in-depth exploration of testing methodologies specific to Redux Saga, a middleware for managing side effects in JavaScript applications. It discusses the complexities of testing Redux Sagas, including their asynchronous nature and the handling of side effects, and offers insights into unit testing sagas through step-by-step or full saga execution approaches. The article also delves into advanced testing techniques for branching logic and error handling, and highlights common pitfalls and best practices. A challenging task for the reader would be to implement and test a Redux Saga that includes branching logic and error handling, using tools like redux-saga-test-plan for comprehensive coverage and robustness.

Don't Get Left Behind:
The Top 5 Career-Ending Mistakes Software Developers Make
FREE Cheat Sheet for Software Developers